<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The IIAR Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iiar.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Institute of Industry Analyst Relations: Le Blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Analyst of the year - submit your answers today by Duncan Chapple</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Chapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62;What’s the implication if TowerGroup places well, and everyone in AR at Edelman is able to vote?

That TowerGroup decides it no longer needs an agency? Sorry, old agency scars starting to throb ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;What’s the implication if TowerGroup places well, and everyone in AR at Edelman is able to vote?</p>
<p>That TowerGroup decides it no longer needs an agency? Sorry, old agency scars starting to throb <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analyst of the year - submit your answers today by Jonny Bentwood</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Bentwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Reposting comment that I have just posted on the Tekrati blog...

I would like to comment on a few of the points raised. 

Firstly, the sole objective of this exercise is to promote analyst relations and those analysts and firms who people believe deserve recognition for doing outstanding work. 

This is not isolated and regularly happens in other fields such as PR (see &lt;a href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/home/article/795953/front-page-influential-all/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PR Week Power Book&lt;/a&gt;). I think it is only natural that a similar exercise is rolled out across AR too. 

For too long AR has been seen as an add-on extra to a PR campaign - the IIAR aims to combat this largely by raising awareness and this is a great tool top do so. I am hoping that raising awareness can only be food for the industry which will include companies such as Tekrati and FD. 

Nevertheless I am concerned when people question the independence of the IIAR as no 3rd parties are validating the results. The survey and in its final form was agreed by approx 10 people working in-house and from agencies - the consensus-approach to this survey will ensure that no tampering is possible. 

A few things this survey will and will not do:
- It will say who people think are the best analyst and analyst of the year are. 
- It will not say the worst. 

With regard to the questionnaire layout. Even though this was tested and approved by a dozen people I think there is large room for improvement. It is a bit late now to backtrack on the questions and agree it could improve - which it will for next year. 

It is inevitable that with any survey people will get worried about the results. This is something that the IIAR have no control over - people will vote for whoever they see fit. If that person or company gets the most votes then they will do well regardless. We have always tried to make this as open as possible and I am pleased that my peers throughout the industry globally have promoted the survey. 

As a final point - the survey is still open. The IIAR is open to all ideas about how we can promote ICT analysts and AR - if you would like to help do this (either as part of this survey or in general) please get in touch with the IIAR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reposting comment that I have just posted on the Tekrati blog&#8230;</p>
<p>I would like to comment on a few of the points raised. </p>
<p>Firstly, the sole objective of this exercise is to promote analyst relations and those analysts and firms who people believe deserve recognition for doing outstanding work. </p>
<p>This is not isolated and regularly happens in other fields such as PR (see <a href="http://www.prweek.com/uk/home/article/795953/front-page-influential-all/" rel="nofollow">PR Week Power Book</a>). I think it is only natural that a similar exercise is rolled out across AR too. </p>
<p>For too long AR has been seen as an add-on extra to a PR campaign - the IIAR aims to combat this largely by raising awareness and this is a great tool top do so. I am hoping that raising awareness can only be food for the industry which will include companies such as Tekrati and FD. </p>
<p>Nevertheless I am concerned when people question the independence of the IIAR as no 3rd parties are validating the results. The survey and in its final form was agreed by approx 10 people working in-house and from agencies - the consensus-approach to this survey will ensure that no tampering is possible. </p>
<p>A few things this survey will and will not do:<br />
- It will say who people think are the best analyst and analyst of the year are.<br />
- It will not say the worst. </p>
<p>With regard to the questionnaire layout. Even though this was tested and approved by a dozen people I think there is large room for improvement. It is a bit late now to backtrack on the questions and agree it could improve - which it will for next year. </p>
<p>It is inevitable that with any survey people will get worried about the results. This is something that the IIAR have no control over - people will vote for whoever they see fit. If that person or company gets the most votes then they will do well regardless. We have always tried to make this as open as possible and I am pleased that my peers throughout the industry globally have promoted the survey. </p>
<p>As a final point - the survey is still open. The IIAR is open to all ideas about how we can promote ICT analysts and AR - if you would like to help do this (either as part of this survey or in general) please get in touch with the IIAR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analyst of the year - submit your answers today by Barbara French</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Where do you indicate who's not eligible to vote? 

Case in point, most likely you are excluding everyone at PR/marketing/consulting agencies that have had 1 or more analyst firms as clients within the last X months.  What's the implication if TowerGroup places well, and everyone in AR at Edelman is able to vote?

Better to state your rules in advance and in the open, isn't it? Let people know upfront whether their vote -- and anyone else's -- will be tossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you indicate who&#8217;s not eligible to vote? </p>
<p>Case in point, most likely you are excluding everyone at PR/marketing/consulting agencies that have had 1 or more analyst firms as clients within the last X months.  What&#8217;s the implication if TowerGroup places well, and everyone in AR at Edelman is able to vote?</p>
<p>Better to state your rules in advance and in the open, isn&#8217;t it? Let people know upfront whether their vote &#8212; and anyone else&#8217;s &#8212; will be tossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analyst of the year - submit your answers today by Barbara French</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Where do you indicate who's not eligible to vote? 

Case in point, most likely you are excluding everyone at PR/marketing/consulting agencies that have had 1 or more analyst firms as clients within the last X months.  What's the implication if TowerGroup places well, and everyone in AR at Edelman is able to vote?

Better to state your rules in advance and in the open, isn't it? Let people know upfront whether their vote -- and anyone else's -- will be tossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you indicate who&#8217;s not eligible to vote? </p>
<p>Case in point, most likely you are excluding everyone at PR/marketing/consulting agencies that have had 1 or more analyst firms as clients within the last X months.  What&#8217;s the implication if TowerGroup places well, and everyone in AR at Edelman is able to vote?</p>
<p>Better to state your rules in advance and in the open, isn&#8217;t it? Let people know upfront whether their vote &#8212; and anyone else&#8217;s &#8212; will be tossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analyst of the year by Keeping Tabs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analyst Idols - vote for the best and worst</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today-2/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeping Tabs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analyst Idols - vote for the best and worst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today-2/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>[...] you perform analyst relations as part of your job, you can vote by filling out the IIAR&#8217;s Analyst of the Year survey. You don&#8217;t need to join the IIAR to participate, however you must include registration info [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you perform analyst relations as part of your job, you can vote by filling out the IIAR&#8217;s Analyst of the Year survey. You don&#8217;t need to join the IIAR to participate, however you must include registration info [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analyst of the year - submit your answers today by Blog readership continues to double &#171; The IIAR Blog</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog readership continues to double &#171; The IIAR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>[...] on Ethics and Independence Among Industry Analysts has caught huge attention, as has Jonny&#8217;s Analyst of the year [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Ethics and Independence Among Industry Analysts has caught huge attention, as has Jonny&#8217;s Analyst of the year [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics and Independence Among Industry Analysts by Blog readership continues to double &#171; The IIAR Blog</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/07/ethics-and-independence-among-industry-analysts/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog readership continues to double &#171; The IIAR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-159</guid>
		<description>[...] post on Ethics and Independence Among Industry Analysts has caught huge attention, as has Jonny&#8217;s Analyst of the year [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on Ethics and Independence Among Industry Analysts has caught huge attention, as has Jonny&#8217;s Analyst of the year [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analyst of the year - submit your answers today by Helzerman&#8217;s Odd Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analyst of the Year - vote in II AR survey</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Helzerman&#8217;s Odd Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Analyst of the Year - vote in II AR survey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>[...] http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/" rel="nofollow">http://iiar.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/analyst-of-the-year-submit-your-answers-today/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this blog by Ludovic</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/about/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ludovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Which list? We don't maintain an analyst firm directory but Tekrati does. The 451 did not contact the IIAR for an interview...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which list? We don&#8217;t maintain an analyst firm directory but Tekrati does. The 451 did not contact the IIAR for an interview&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this blog by Curious1</title>
		<link>http://iiar.wordpress.com/about/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I am surprised that you do not have The 451 Group on your list? They are rported to be a little over $15M in sales and have a strong value prop for looking at the IT research industry from the bottom up - looking at those  technologies and technolgy companies that are disrupting the traditonal IT infrastructure players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised that you do not have The 451 Group on your list? They are rported to be a little over $15M in sales and have a strong value prop for looking at the IT research industry from the bottom up - looking at those  technologies and technolgy companies that are disrupting the traditonal IT infrastructure players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
